What To Do When a Buyer Says, “Your Price is Too High”?
Apply Strategic Reframing to Respond to a Buyer’s Decision Criteria

Identify Criteria
Discover where the buyer’s priorities lean on the spectrum from price-focused to value-focused. They may care about outcomes but still face a hard budget limit or may prioritize price for one purchase and value for another. The goal is to learn how they’re making this particular decision, then respond accordingly. You can quickly gauge their priorities by listening for:
- How they define “best”: lowest upfront price or best result for the total cost.
- What they compare: price alone - or scope, support, risk, and likely downstream costs.
- Which trade-offs they’ll consider: design, service level, timing, or scope.
- What guides the decision: a specific business result, a firm price limit, or both.
These neutral questions can help surface the buyer’s priorities without labeling them:
- “What matters most as you compare options? Are there budget limits or outcomes you especially need to account for?”
If the buyer wants to discuss value, risk, or long-term results, follow up:
- “How do value, risk, fit, and long-term results factor into the decision?”
Respond to the Buyer’s Priorities
- If price is the main criterion: explain what fits their budget and ask about scope or timing only if that could help.
- If outcomes matter: explore goals and compare total cost, risk, and results.
- If both matter: acknowledge their budget and outcome constraints, then assess fit.
If outcomes do matter, Strategic Reframing helps shift a conversation from the stated objection to the concerns and assumptions behind it—such as time to launch, lifetime cost, or productivity. When the buyer is weighing outcomes, for example:
“You mentioned that missed handoffs are delaying launches. If our process can reduce those delays, would it be useful to estimate the potential time savings together and compare that with the price?”
Why This Reframe Work
- It acknowledges the buyer’s perspective.
- It turns a broad objection into a specific conversation about comparisons, expected results, and budget.
- It opens the door to comparing scope, timelines, and measures of success.









